Harry Potter… er, Peredur and the Holy Grail… er, Deathly Hallows. Of Hogwarts.

December 22, 2006

Since I can’t get to sleep with these cold pills in me, let us theorize.

1st Theory –

Once upon a time, there was a young man named Peredur or Percival or Galahad or… Harry Potter. His father was a great and powerful knight… er, wizard, who was either dead or at court or on a quest. Gone, anyway. So his son was raised way back in the waybacks, far from civilized society, without any knowledge of the world that should have been his own. Occasionally, he saw strange noble people come by, but the people who raised him lied about their identity.

But finally, he learned the truth, and set out to follow in his father’s footsteps. He came to a magic castle by a lake — a castle named… Camelot? Carbonek? Montsalvat? Hogwarts? Anyway, he met an old man there who was very kind to him and told him about his family. The old man trained him in the arts and manners of that strange new world, and told him everything he needed to know. But the young man was too polite to ask what was up with the strange magical items there and who they were to serve, or the old man’s wound, or how the land could be healed. He went on his way when he was fully trained, questing against all sorts of monsters, looking for his relatives…

But in the end, he had to return to the magic castle, and ask questions, and fix what was broken.

2nd Theory –

Because once upon a time, there were four founders of Hogwarts who were the keepers of four holy relics: the plate that Jesus used at the Last Supper, the kiddush cup from the same, Longinus’ spear, and the sword that slew St. John the Baptist, or which St. Peter used on Malchus. (Or maybe the actual Instruments of the Passion. Though, to be honest, the Byzantine Empire did a pretty good job of distributing bits and pieces of most of the Instruments in bits and pieces all around Europe and the Mideast.)

We know Godric Gryffindor had a sword. UPDATE: Brandon points out in the comments below that Helga Hufflepuff had a cup. We don’t know what the other Founders had… though of course the Horcruxes may well be involved.  So whether we’re talking the Grail stuff called Hallows or the Irish/Scottish ones or even a few of the Welsh Thirteen Treasures… it’s entirely possible that turning Hogwarts Hallows into Horcruxes would make them truly Deathly.

3rd Theory –

The Founders are buried in or around Hogwarts, like Bran’s head, and their mausoleum keeps the place safe. (As in the Hallows of Tolkien’s Gondor.) Although one hopes that the wizards can’t be described as “a withering people whose only ‘hallows’ are their tombs.” All those rotten kids should have been attending the school chapel on Sunday; then they’d have known. This is supported by the reported comment of Rowling to the director that Hogwarts had a burial area, and that it was not outside the walls. Common medieval practice would have people buried in tombs in the castle church/chapel, under the church floor, in the church crypt (all three suitable for high ranking people), or in the churchyard surrounding the church.

Given how lively Headmasters’ portraits and ordinary paintings and statues are, one wonders about funerary effigies and brasses of the Founders. Would they come to life in the hour of Hogwarts’ greatest need?

4th Theory –

Godric’s Hollow = Godric’s Hallow.

5th Theory –

That darned cup in the cave was either the Grail (probably belonging to one of the founders), or a forged evil and opposite copy of it. Maybe it’s even the Deathly Hallows. R.A.B. was Rex Arturus Britanniae. He was already going to die from his wound, so he and the Lady of the Lake….

Since “Weasley Is Our King”, Ron Weasley must be king rightwise born of all the Britons. (Darn those German Windsors, Scottish Stuarts, traitorous Welsh-French Tudors, pesky French Plantagenets, and invading Normans and Saxons! The true line of the Penweasel lives!) Ronald will pull the sword from the stone and inherit the crown of his fathers, maintaining the Celtic tradition of election of the most suitable from a pool of males with the right birth. (Sorry about your luck, Mr. Weasley. And Mr. Blair. And Elizabeth Windsor.)

Obviously this makes Hermione Guenevere and Harry Merlin. Or maybe Hermione’s Merlin, and Harry’s Lancelot. You could argue either way.

But anyway, Arthur fought an emperor named Lucius.

6th Theory –

“The Deathly Hallows” is a name along the lines of “The Perilous Siege”. Only the right person, or the worthy person, can go there and get out unscathed. Or maybe what you do there is worth the deathliness.

UPDATE: 7th Theory –

Since the game Hangman keeps getting mentioned, and “Weasley Must Die”, and the Weasley twins are even selling Hangman… well, maybe somebody will put Ron up on a gallows, either to gain power from the sacrifice of a king, or just to pressure Harry. Or maybe Percy will be framed and set up for hanging. Or maybe he’ll try to kill himself. (I’m trying to remember the ritual murder thing of the bog people. Hanging, drowning, and bludgeoning, wasn’t it? And some kind of theorized connection with Taranis’ mallet?) There are also certain magical ingredients that only can grow in the shadow of a gallows, and others that are taken from hanged men.

Somebody else with theories.

Entry Filed under: fandom. .

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Brandon  |  December 22, 2006 at 11:55 pm

    The second theory seems pretty implausible to me; but don’t we actually know that Helga Hufflepuff had a cup (the one Tom Riddle killed Hepzibah Smith for)?

    Reply
  • 2. suburbanbanshee  |  December 23, 2006 at 2:09 am

    Thank you, Brandon. We do know that, when we fans actually get enough sleep. :)

    In fact, I even remember wondering briefly back when I first read the sixth book whether the sword and cup pattern would be followed out. But I didn’t remember until just now. Clearly, I shall have to do a reread of all the books.

    Reply
  • 3. Robin  |  December 23, 2006 at 8:38 am

    As tempting as Theory 2 is, I have to admit that when I think of a group of four that includes “sword” and “cup,” I figure the other two are going to be “wands” and “coins.” It seems to me more likely that in Rowling’s universe, the symbols of the scholarly founders of the wizarding world’s school would be the origin of the signs found in the Tarot. Of course, in our world, the Tarot suits probably referred to the sword, grail, plate, and lance in the first place. If Rowling ends up drawing deliberately on Tarot, that echo of the relics will be there, but possibly not intentionally. So, have we heard a reference to either wands or coins connected to Slytherin or Ravenclaw? (Any one of the founders might have easily been known for his or her wand.)

    Reply
  • 4. suburbanbanshee  |  December 24, 2006 at 3:06 am

    Well, actually in our world, the Tarot suits apparently originally referred to four different estates of life: cups for clergy, swords for knights, coins for merchants, and wands/batons are cudgels for peasants. (Though in the wizarding world, they’d probably be wands for wizards.)

    Reply
  • 5. Wonderduck  |  December 24, 2006 at 3:24 pm

    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

    I used to run a bookstore, back when the third book was about to be released. About six months before the release, Scholastic sent out promo materials (posters, standups, and the like) saying that the title was “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

    It wasn’t until the Wednesday before release, when the books were delivered, that we learned that they had been spoofing us.

    So, personally, while all your writing on what it MEANS is VERY interesting, and sounds entirely plausible, I don’t trust Scholastic or JK Rowling enough to believe any prerelease title until I actually have the book in my sweaty little wings.

    Reply
  • 6. joey  |  May 6, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    I believe that Ravenclaw had the cup, and Slytherin had the locket, and Gryffindor the sword. Though, I am unsure of the possession that Hufflepuff had. I’m rereading the sixth book at the moment, and I hadn’t realized how much I had forgotten, so it is a good idea to reread them, before the seventh book is released.

    Reply
  • 7. Mindy  |  July 1, 2007 at 11:58 am

    ok, some of these actually make sense, and some, well….are a little out there. But i like them nontheless.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

December 2006
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Most Recent Posts