Human Obedience to God and Its Positive Effects

I said something over on Sarah Hoyt’s blog, and got a comment back that showed that my comment needed more explication than was realistic for me to do on anybody else’s blog. So I promised to make a post over here, and I am.

The basic plot of salvation history, and basic doctrine to pretty much all Christians, is the following:

A. Adam and Eve were the first humans. Adam was the head of the whole human race, and Eve was the mother of the human race. They were the head creatures of all Creation on earth (ie, not of the angels). Therefore, their first sin, the Fall, messed up the entire human race and made it more prone to sin (I’m saying it this way because some groups don’t go with “original sin” terminology; but whatever Romans 5:14 means to you, take that as given), lost us a lot of our original abilities and intelligence and longevity, and messed up the animals and plants on earth as well (or at least made them less friendly to us and less under our care and power). God told Adam and Eve what the effects and what their punishment would be for the whole human race, but also promised offspring that would tread on the serpent’s head. Christians traditionally see this bit as “the first Gospel,” the first foreshadowing of Christ’s coming. God then continues to work through human history to create a covenant with Abraham and to teach His Law. Finally He sends His Son to bring us salvation and teaching, make us members of His Body through His Church, and to live and die and rise for us to give us eternal life in Him.

B. Although no normal human being who was only human had the power to redeem Adam and Eve’s sin, or even his or her own sin, salvation history clearly shows that people who obey God’s commands make things better, just as people who disobey make things worse. Noah’s obedience saves the human race and the animals from total destruction. Abraham and Isaac’s obedience and trust are the foundation (on their side of things, anyway) of God’s covenant with His people. Moses’ obedience and trust are used by God to save Israel and bring them out of bondage. Elijah and the remnant refuse to bend the knee to Baal. Esther saves all the Jews of Persia through her brave speaking up for them. God blesses Israel through, and for the sake of, even a few obedient people; and He blesses His disciples and His new Church the same way, in the New Testament. Also, “the prayer of a righteous man avails much.”

C. Jesus Christ’s obedience “unto death, death on a cross,” is the obedience of Someone Who is both true God and true Man. He is the New Adam (1 Cor. 15:45-49), Who not only doesn’t sin, but Who conquers and kills sin and death and its effects – through total obedience and offering Himself, as well as through His suffering and death. He calls all Christians to do likewise in their own little way, becoming part of His Body and then proceeding to take up their crosses and follow Him, suffering and even dying with similar obedience to God. Paul even dares to describe this in Colossians 1:24 as “[I, Paul] who now rejoice in my sufferings for you, and in my flesh fill up those things that are wanting of the sufferings of Christ, for His Body which is the Church.” So obviously any human can do things to help with salvation history, and we can be “coworkers of the Truth.” (3 John 1:8)

Now we move to the stuff that not everybody believes.

If there’s a new Adam, obviously there’s a new Eve. In an eschatological way, that’s the Church in Heaven as Christ’s Bride “without spot or wrinkle.” However, pretty much all the early Christians saw Mary as the opposite of Eve in every possible human way, and the Annunciation to Mary by Gabriel as the opposite of Eve’s temptation by the snake. (The opposite to Adam’s fall to Eve’s urging to eat the fruit in the garden was often seen as Jesus’ successful struggle against disobedience in the Garden of Gethsemane, although obviously His entire Passion and Death and Resurrection were the real opposite of the Fall.) “Ave” as the opposite of “Eva” was early Christian Latin-speakers’ joke about the matter. This was reinforced or founded upon Jesus’ calling Mary “Woman,” just as Eve was called “Woman” in Eden before the Fall. Also, Jesus on the Cross told John that Mary would now be his mother and he would be her son. This was seen as the parallel to Adam naming Eve as the “mother of all the living,” (Havah, Eve) and that it indicated that Mary was also the mother of every member of Christ’s body. Early Christian art and monograms also refer to these beliefs.

In the Book of Revelation, the various evil female figures (Babylon, Jezabel) are countered not only by Christ, but also by both the Bride and the Woman clothed in the Sun, who is apparently also the Ark of His Covenant and the mother of the man child. The Woman is primarily identified by early authors with the Church, but she also gets connected to Mary a lot, as Mary being a type of the Church’s motherhood (through Baptism and teaching doctrine) of all the members of Christ’s Body.

All this brings us to Saint Irenaeus of Lyons, a Greek-speaker from Asia Minor who was sent to Lyons (Lugdunum) to be bishop after the entire church hierarchy of Lyons, and many of its lay members, were martyred in the arena in various nasty ways. He describes himself as being the direct disciple of old St. Polycarp, who was the direct disciple of old St. John, who was an apostle of Jesus. You don’t get more direct than that.

If you’ve never read Against Heresies, it’s an interesting book. His basic goal is to explain how various little groups are misusing and abusing Scripture, as if using the bits of mosaic that make a portrait of a King are being moved around and made into a picture of a fox. He then teaches the Christology he learned from his teachers and their apostolic interpretation of the Scriptures. His Christology also leads to saying interesting stuff about Mary, and hence about the Church.

St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 22:

3. Wherefore Luke points out that the pedigree which traces the generation of our Lord back to Adam contains seventy-two generations, connecting the end with the beginning, and implying that it is He who has summed up in Himself all nations dispersed from Adam downwards, and all languages and generations of men, together with Adam himself. Hence also was Adam himself termed by Paul “the figure of Him Who was to come,” (Rom. 5:14) because the Word, the Maker of all things, had formed beforehand for Himself the future dispensation of the human race, connected with the Son of God; God having predestined that the first man should be of an animal nature, with this view, that he might be saved by the spiritual One. For inasmuch as He had a pre-existence as a saving Being, it was necessary that what might be saved should also be called into existence, in order that the Being who saves should not exist in vain.

4. In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word.” But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. And even as she… having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary… by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race. … For the Lord, having been born “the First-begotten of the dead,” (Rev. 1:5) and receiving into His bosom the ancient fathers, has regenerated them into the life of God, He having been made Himself the beginning of those that live, as Adam became the beginning of those who die. (cf. 1 Cor. 15:20-22) Wherefore also Luke, commencing the genealogy with the Lord, carried it back to Adam, indicating that it was He who regenerated them into the Gospel of life, and not they Him. And thus also it was that the knot of Eve’s disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.

In Book 5, Chapter 19, Irenaeus continues:

1. So that the Lord then was manifestly coming to His own things, and was sustaining them by means of that creation which is supported by Himself, and was making a recapitulation of that disobedience which had occurred in connection with a tree, through the obedience which was [exhibited by Himself when He hung] upon a tree, [the effects] also of that deception being done away with, by which that virgin Eve, who was already espoused to a man, was unhappily misled—was happily announced, through means of the truth [spoken] by the angel to the Virgin Mary, who was [also espoused] to a man. For just as the former was led astray by the word of an angel, so that she fled from God when she had transgressed His word; so did the latter, by an angelic communication, receive the glad tidings that she should sustain (portaret) God, being obedient to His word. And if the former did disobey God, yet the latter was persuaded to be obedient to God, in order that the Virgin Mary might become the patroness (advocata) of the virgin Eve. And thus, as the human race fell into bondage to death by means of a virgin, so is it rescued by a virgin; virginal disobedience having been balanced in the opposite scale by virginal obedience. For in the same way the sin of the first created man (protoplasti) receives amendment by the correction of the First-begotten, and the coming of the serpent is conquered by the harmlessness of the dove; those bonds being unloosed by which we had been fast bound to death.

Tertullian, St. Ambrose, St. Peter Chrysologus, St. Jerome, St. Epiphanius, and many other early Christian writers also address Mary’s obedience as the counter to Eve’s disobedience. St. Justin Martyr, who was even earlier than St. Irenaeus, addresses this subject in his Dialogue with Trypho (a dialogue with a Jewish guy which addresses all sorts of Scriptural topics), in Chapter 100:

He became man by the Virgin, in order that the disobedience which proceeded from the serpent might receive its destruction in the same manner in which it derived its origin. For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the serpent’s word, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy when the angel Gabriel announced the good tidings to her, that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her, and the power of the Highest would overshadow her: wherefore also the Holy Thing begotten of her is the Son of God; and she replied, ‘Be it unto me according to your word.’ (Luke 1:38) And by her has He been born, to whom we have proved so many Scriptures refer, and by whom God destroys both the serpent and those angels and men who are like him; but works deliverance from death to those who repent of their wickedness and believe upon Him.

The “Letter to Diognetus” by “Mathetes” is another really early testimony to this idea, as it describes the Church and each individual Christian as a garden of Paradise. A Christian who cultivates both knowledge and love will have a garden where Eve is not corrupted, but a virgin shows her faith.

Here are some more references.

So I hope this helped.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Remember the 2,996 on 9/11

Two thousand, nine hundred and ninety-six of us never made it home that night.

We remember the attack. We do not forget the fallen.

James P. O’Brien

Myrna Yaskulka

David Seima Aoyama

Sanae Mori

Brian Martineau

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Great Moments in Customer Requests

My current job is not full-time, but I get a fair number of hours and I mostly enjoy the interactions with people. I am also happy to accommodate reasonable requests, even if they are unusual, as long as they don’t go against policy.

The guy who wanted his cheese pizza cut with an implement that hadn’t touched pork (or at least not since being washed)? No problem. If he’d specified everything being kosher or halal or according to Hindu rules, obviously that would have been beyond my powers.


Being asked (and not even for religious reasons) if I would kindly take every single piece of meat off a pre-made deluxe pizza, leaving only the veggies and cheese behind?

No, I’m afraid I can’t do that.

And really, you wouldn’t want the pizza after I did that. Pizzas are delicate. You don’t unmake one without some loss of quality and appearance.

The customer is always right; but when it comes to food, there are some things that can’t be done. Physics, government, practicality, wastage… lots of reasons.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

An Aramaic Animation

Check it out. It’s a bit slow, but the payoff line is good.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Wow, This Is Just Stupid

If you’re Jewish, and your “edge-walking” feminist spiritual movement is using Canaanite paganism as its guidestar, you’re doing it wrong.

Here’s an interview with a would-be “kohenet.”

Like St. John said about the heretic Cerinthus, you don’t want to be around if the house decides to fall on an enemy of the truth. These idjits are begging God to smite them. And apparently they have a school that will take their money before the smitey part happens.

So yeah, I guess it’s good to know that Catholics don’t have a monopoly on idjits, but that’s the only bright side here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Black Market Selling “Extra” Surrogate Babies

In India, there’s a big business peddling the wombs of surrogate mothers. Companies hire them, get them impregnated, and make them stay in dorms which are basically comfy prisons with good food and health care. (Which is a good deal, if you’re an extremely poor Indian woman, but still isn’t fair.)

The dark side of all test tube babies is that multiple eggs are fertilized with sperm. Many die, but many live. The surviving proto-babies are implanted in the mother’s or surrogate’s womb. In the US, “extra” babies that survive are often “reduced” inside the womb to “give the other baby a better chance to live;” although many parents are okay with having multiple babies at once. (Which is good, but of course they usually had already set things up to have a buttload of their own kids die in the Petri dish.) But there was a notorious case in Thailand of an American couple abandoning their Downs Syndrome baby and only taking the “good” twin home.

In India, some companies keep the existence of “extra” babies secret, let the surrogate woman deliver them all, and then sell them on the black market to desperate would-be adoptive parents.

Read about it here.

Here’s footage from the original HBO investigative reporting show.

Followup by an Australian news show of an Australian couple that abandoned their surrogate-born boy in India (because they already had one boy and didn’t want another) and kept their girl baby. The boy was adopted by another family in India, but it’s not clear whether he was sold or given. (And either way, it’s not terribly legal under Australian or Indian law.)

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Mary the Unknotter – Papal Edition!

I’ve written here before about the growing devotion to Our Lady as “the Untier of Knots” or “Mary the Unknotter”. Here’s the Pope sitting with his copy, over at the Vatican.

Here’s a post about how the devotion started in Augsburg, Germany; and here’s another about the patristic roots (ie, St. Irenaeus) of the devotional image.

Pope Francis is one of the many South Americans who are devoted to Mary as “La Desatadora.” He has often praised her under this title, too.

So Philadelphia’s cathedral is setting up an art exhibit in honor of Our Lady, which is a nice idea. But unfortunately the sculpture is of nothing but ugly knots and a loom of people’s written problems, rather than of Mary’s intercession and God’s power helping to untie them for us and make things right. But it’s not the ugliest modern art installation ever, and it’s at least trying to be reverent. Here’s the Philadelphia folks from the Presbyterian Church’s blogpost about it. Here’s the Mercy and Justice Committee page about it, which includes one of the Untier of Knots devotional prayers.

(Some news reports said that people were being invited to burn their knots and their sins, but apparently this was incorrect. Which I’m glad to hear, because the whole “burning sins” thing has been associated in the US with Catholics being told they don’t have to go to Confession if they go to a sin-burning session.)

Also, we have a nice example of urban hagiography legends, as the newspaper tells us that young Fr. Jorge Bergoglio was the first guy to bring the devotion to Argentina and Brazil! Seriously??? Please check your timelines, my friends.

The devotion to Our Lady under this title actually was around for quite a while, and was even suppressed for a bit for being done in a weird and occultish way. He was one of the younger priests who favored bringing it back in a good way, so of course he is now getting a lot of the credit. (Heh, I remember seeing absolutely nothing about some guy named Bergoglio on Desatadora websites, and a lot of stuff about how you shouldn’t be confused by the weird occultish people’s weirdness. Now the Pope is everywhere, and the sketchy part of the history is forgotten. So you can’t really blame the newspapers for getting caught up in it.)

Father Bergoglio did commission a painting of Mary for the Universidad de Salvador chapel, which in 1986 was given to the parish church of San Jose del Talar. It was based on a nice postcard brought back by Bergoglio from visiting her painting in Augsburg. The parish is now Argentina’s national shrine for “Our Lady who unties the knots;” and there are special devotions at 6 AM on the eighth of every month (because this is a title related to Mary as the Immaculate Conception and the New Eve, and the Feast of the Immaculate Conception is December 8).

Here’s a gallery of photos of the parish. (I like the big Christ statue.) The parish also features Confession being available all the time the church is open, and other prayer-friendly features. Naturally they are very proud of Pope Francis!

(It all looks very likeable. The only thing I don’t like is that it’s creepy to put the presiders’ chairs on the top steps of the old altar against the wall. I don’t think they meant to put people’s butts up there where the worship used to be, but it just looks bad.)

Here’s a chapel also dedicated to Our Lady Untier of Knots, at a drug addiction treatment center. There’s a picture of Archbishop Bergoglio.

The article says:

Cardinal Bergoglio explained that the devotion to Our Lady, Untier of Knots, arose around the year AD 1700, promoted for a marriage that was in permanent conflict of spouses.

“It occurred to this gentleman to ask the Virgin to fix the situation. As he was a very Christian man, he found a phrase written by St. Irenaeus of Lyons in the year 200, which says, “The knots which were tied by Eve’s disobedience and lack of faith, were untied by the obedience and faith of Mary.” All the knots that arm us with our failings, problems, infidelities — like a good mother, she is going to untie them. This is the meaning of this image,” he defined.

“This here cannot be called a construction company’s enterprise. The boys have made this church with their own hands, day by day, under the direction of Father Alejandro. The children make a house for their Mother, because she unties the knots for us. We all have knots in our hearts. We all have failings, and we all go through difficulties in life,” added Cardinal Bergoglio.

Here’s a remixed South American version of the traditional German iconography.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized